MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998692650 · doi:10.1353/can.2010.0010

Coast to Coast: Hockey in Canada to the Second World War (review)

2010· article· en· W1998692650 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Daniel S. Mason

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorld War IIMedia studiesCommodificationTheme (computing)HistoryPolitical scienceSociologyEconomyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Coast to Coast: Hockey in Canada to the Second World War Daniel S. Mason Coast to Coast: Hockey in Canada to the Second World War. Edited by John Chi-Kit Wong. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009. Pp. 256, $70.00 cloth, $29.95 paper Coast to Coast represents another addition to a body of literature that has not received widespread scholarly attention. According to the book’s editor, John Chi-Kit Wong, the overarching theme of the book explores how hockey emerged as a signifier of Canadianness (viii), while at the same time clarifying and rearticulating the formation and organization of the sport in different contexts and among different groups. In doing so, more insight into the appropriateness of viewing hockey as a common cultural experience is revealed. The book features seven chapters exploring the game through the end of the Second World War. Wong should be applauded in his attempt to find some cohesion among the seemingly disparate research interests of the contributing authors. He acknowledges the difficulty in finding appropriate contributors (at least those capable of broadly meeting the intended goals of the edited work). Not surprisingly, several chapters seem to be ‘reaching’ somewhat in meeting these aims. Nevertheless, one thread through many of the chapters is the commodification of the sport and the influence of commercialization on stakeholders. Carly Adams’s chapter on the Ladies Ontario Hockey Association reveals some interesting and contradictory issues facing women’s hockey. She shows how the women’s game struggled to gain a foothold in the popular imagination, yet acknowledges that the rise of the Preston Rivulettes – which did draw widespread attention to women’s hockey – ultimately undermined the delivery system as a result of the team’s competitive dominance. Many chapters are highly descriptive, and few overtly challenge notions of the meanings of hockey discussed in previous research. An exception is Stacy Lorenz and Geraint Osborne’s reprisal of their work examining violence and masculinity in hockey matches, and how local newspapers articulated these themes. A strong contribution that this chapter makes is in how it questions assumptions about class-based views of violence that appear in other works examining hockey during the early twentieth century. The authors’ discussion of violence during games (and its tacit acceptance by the media) is particularly useful (190). Another refreshing take is found in Robert Kossuth’s chapter on hockey in southern Alberta, which challenges perceptions that hockey was uniformly adopted as a sporting institution across Canada. He [End Page 588] describes the sport’s emergence in light of other more popular sporting practices in smaller Alberta centres that, similar to other communities, remained tied to boosterism and concerns about professionalism. Too many of the chapters in Coast to Coast get bogged down in detail that will be of interest to only a limited audience. Some chapters have been reworked or adapted from previous work, and topics are so focused that it is difficult to see how they connect to other works in the book. Others read disjointedly as they attempt to cover as many bases as possible. For example, the discussion of women’s hockey in Kossuth’s chapter seems misplaced, or at the very least incongruent with the flow of the rest of the chapter. The book might have been better framed around a theme such as boosterism, or entrepreneurialism, which would have given the authors a better opportunity to develop chapters that cohere as a collection. In terms of scholarship, several chapters are capably situated within the broader literature, and the authors use appropriate sources to flesh out their respective narratives. To do so, the authors have meticulously pieced together sources. In some cases, this is difficult where foundational sources exist only in the popular literature. For example, Wong is forced to rely, in part, on player biographies (such as Whitehead’s works The Patricks and Cyclone Taylor) or the work of amateur historians (such as Coleman’s Trail of the Stanley Cup) in his chapter on the Vancouver franchise. However, he has unearthed interesting archival sources on the team and its owners. Until a more definitive scholarly history of hockey is written, these will remain the constraints...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207