Enolpyruvyl Activation by Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate Synthase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (AroA, also called EPSP synthase) is a carboxyvinyl transferase involved in aromatic amino acid biosynthesis, forming EPSP from shikimate 3-phosphate and phosphoenolpyruvate. Upon extended incubation, EPSP ketal, a side product, forms by intramolecular nucleophilic addition of O4 to C2' of the enolpyruvyl group. The catalytic significance of this reaction was unclear, as it was initially proposed to arise from nonenzymatic breakdown of tetrahedral intermediate that had dissociated from AroA. This study shows that EPSP ketal formed in AroA's active site, not nonenzymatically, by demonstrating its formation in the presence of excess AroA. It formed both in the normal reaction and during AroA-catalyzed EPSP hydrolysis. In addition, nonenzymatic EPSP hydrolysis was studied to elucidate the catalytic imperative for enolpyruvyl reactions. Hydrolysis was acid-catalyzed, with a rate enhancement of >5 x 10(8)-fold. There was no detectable EPSP breakdown after 16 days at 90 degrees C in 1 M KOH, a solution that is 1000-fold more nucleophilic than neutral aqueous solutions. Thus, an unactivated enolpyruvyl group is not susceptible to nucleophilic attack. Enzymatic EPSP ketal formation therefore requires enolpyruvyl activation through protonation of C3' to form either a cationic intermediate or a highly cation-like transition state. Forming an EPSP cation requires the investment of considerable catalytic power by AroA. Such an intermediate is a potential target motif for inhibitor design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".