Comparison of Theory and Observations of the Chirality of Filaments within a Dispersing Activity Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate the origin of the hemispheric pattern of filaments and filament channels by comparing theoretical predictions with observations of the chirality of filament channels within a dispersing activity complex. Our aim is to determine how the chirality of each specific channel arises so that general principles underlying the hemispheric pattern can be recognized. We simulate the field lines representing the filaments in the activity complex by applying a model of global flux transport to an initial magnetic configuration. The model combines the surface effects of differential rotation, meridional flows, and supergranular diffusion along with a magnetofrictional relaxation method in the overlying corona. The simulations are run with and without injecting axial magnetic fields at polarity inversion lines in the dispersing activity complex for four successive solar rotations. When the initial magnetic configuration, based on synoptic magnetic maps, is set to a potential field at the beginning of each rotation, the simulations poorly predict the chirality of the filament channels and filaments. The cases that predict the correct chirality correspond to an initial polarity inversion line, which is north-south; the wrong chirality arises when the initial polarity inversion lines lie east-west. Results improve when field-line connectivities at low latitudes are retained and allowed to propagate to higher latitudes without resetting the field to a potential configuration between each rotation. When axial flux emergence exceeding 1 × 10 19 Mx day -1 is included at the location of each filament, an excellent agreement is obtained between the theory and observations. In additon to predicting the correct chirality in all cases, axial flux emergence allows more readily the production of inverse-polarity dipped field lines needed to support filamentary mass. An origin for the hemispheric pattern as a result of the combined effects of flux transport, axial flux emergence, and magnetic helicity is then discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".