Pre‐ and post‐thaw assessment of intracellular ice formation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intracellular ice formation (IIF) refers to the formation of ice crystals within cells during rapid freezing. To develop an understanding of the means by which intracellular ice forms and the mechanisms by which it damages cells and tissues requires techniques that combine real-time assessment of ice nucleation and ice crystal growth with detailed assessments of cell structure and function. Intracellular ice formation has been detected in live samples using light scattering, freeze substitution and fluorescent detection. In this study we develop a method to correlate IIF with post-thaw structural analyses by combining low temperature microscopy and freeze substitution. V79-4 hamster fibroblasts were frozen on a low temperature microscope at various temperatures, IIF was visualized using the nucleic acid-specific fluorophore SYTO 13, then the samples were fixed (10% formaldehyde, 85% ethanol, 5% acetic acid) while still frozen. The monolayers were then thawed and stained with routine histological stains haematoxylin and eosin and assessed. Fixation allowed for the post-thaw assessment of IIF and for subsequent histological processing to examine in detail the structural consequences of IIF. The post-thaw identification of cells that form intracellular ice during freezing is a significant improvement to current methods used in low temperature biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it