Delayed suprachoroidal haemorrhage following Boston Keratoprosthesis in two aniridic patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the heightened success of the Boston Keratoprosthesis type I (KPro) has broadened its indications and also uncovered new complications, the most common being retroprosthetic membrane formation, endophthalmitis, progression of glaucoma and infectious keratitis.1 This study reports on the development of delayed appositional suprachoroidal haemorrhage in two aniridic patients, a rare complication post-KPro surgery. A 69-year-old woman with aniridia and glaucoma presented 3 days post-KPro surgery OD with pain and decreased vision. Ocular history included an extracapsular cataract extraction with vitrectomy OD and a KPro surgery OS. Medical history was non-contributory. On exam, visual acuity was light perception (CF (counting fingers) preop and HM (hand motion) on postop 1 day) and the intraocular pressure (IOP) on manual palpation was 5 mm Hg OD and 15 mm Hg OS. Biomicroscopy revealed an injected conjunctiva, a formed anterior chamber, intact sutures and a well-placed KPro covered by a soft contact lens. B-scan confirmed the presence of a suprachoroidal haemorrhage. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".