Isomerization of the proline in the M2–M3 linker is not required for activation of the human 5‐HT<sub>3</sub>A receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Each subunit of the cation-selective members of the Cys-loop family of ligand-gated ion channels contains a conserved proline residue in the extracellular loop between the second and third transmembrane domains. In the mouse homomeric 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3A (5-HT(3)A) receptor, the effects of substitution of this proline by unnatural amino acids led to the suggestion that trans-cis isomerization of the protein backbone at this position is integral to agonist-induced channel opening [Nature (2005) vol. 438, pp. 248-252]. We explored the generality of this conclusion using natural amino acid mutagenesis of the homologous human 5-HT(3)A receptor. The conserved proline (P303) was substituted by either a histidine or tryprophan and the mutant receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes. These mutations did not significantly affect the magnitude of agonist-mediated currents, compromise channel gating by 5-HT or inhibition of 5-HT-induced currents by either picrotoxin or d-tubocurarine. The mutations did, however, result in altered dependence on extracellular Ca(2+) concentration and a 10-fold increase in the rate of receptor desensitization. These results demonstrate an important role for P303 in 5-HT(3)A receptor function but indicate that trans-cis isomerization at this proline is unlikely to be a general mechanism underlying the gating process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".