Osteochondral Lesion Repair of the Knee in the Rabbit after Low-Power Diode Ga-Al-As Laser Biostimulation: An Experimental Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether low-power laser biostimulation of the osteo-chondral lesions of the knee could by itself reduce repair healing time. Surgery was performed on eighteen rabbits; a bilateral osteo-chondral lesion of 2.5mm in diameter and 2mm depth was created in the femoral medial condyle with a drill. The left knee of each animal was treated intraoperatively using the diode Ga-Al-As laser (780nm) with the following parameters: 300 Joules/cm2, 1 Watts, 300 Hertz, 10 minutes; the right knee was left untreated, as control group. The animals were divided into three groups, A, B and C, according to the survival time after surgery, two, six and twelve weeks, respectively. The explants from the femoral condyles, either treated employing laser energy or left untreated, were examined histomorphometrically. Results after laser treatment showed faster healing of the lesion at week 2 (p=0.043) and an overall improvement in cellular morphology (p=0.044), while a more regular aspect of the osteocartilaginous tissue was observed at week 12 (p=0.004). A relationship between laser biostimulation properties and healing of the osteo-chondral defect has been demonstrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".