NMR Studies of Guest Dynamics in Clathrate Hydrates: Spherical Tops SF<sub>6</sub>, SeF<sub>6</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> in Structure II Hydrate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spin−lattice relaxation time measurements, obtained between 2 and ∼150 K, are presented for 19 F in two structure II clathrate hydrates, SF 6 ·17D 2 O and SeF 6 ·17D 2 O, as well as for 1 H in a double structure II deuteriohydrate of methane and tetrahydrofuran- d 8 . The 19 F results were analyzed in terms of three relaxation mechanisms related to the guest motions, including fluctuations in nuclear dipolar couplings and the anisotropic chemical shift, plus a contribution from spin rotation interactions above ∼50 K. For quantitative agreement, the incorporation of a distribution function into the relaxation equations is required to account for the proton disorder in the hydrate cages, in this case a normal distribution in activation energies. The dynamic parameters derived from relaxation measurements also account for the motional narrowing of the 19 F spectra. This is the first instance where a single motional model has accounted for both spectral narrowing and relaxation times for guest dynamics in clathrate hydrates over a wide range of temperatures. The 1 H relaxation times, measured for CH 4 in the small cages of structure II, are generally consistent with the above model, except that, because of quantum symmetry effects, only intermolecular dipolar couplings appear to be effective in providing relaxation. Trends in activation energies for guest reorientation and the associated distributions, as well as previously published work, are discussed in terms of our understanding of guest dynamics in clathrate hydrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".