MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998881406 · doi:10.1115/fedsm2003-45504

Particulate Velocity Measurements in the Intra-Blade Passages of a Centrifugal Slurry Pump

2003· article· en· W1998881406 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jaikrishnan R. Kadambi, M. Mehta, Pathom Charoenngam, Mark P. Wernet, John M. Sankovic, GR Addie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicErosion and Abrasive Machining
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGlobal Institute for Water Security, University of SaskatchewanCase Western Reserve University
KeywordsImpellerMaterials scienceSuctionSlurryParticle image velocimetryMechanicsCentrifugal pumpCasingParticle (ecology)Trailing edgeBlade (archaeology)Kinetic energyLeading edgeComposite materialMechanical engineeringGeologyPhysicsEngineeringTurbulenceClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of a slurry pump is to transport solids in a mixture called a slurry. It is a critical component of the slurry transport system in many industrial and mining related processes. In this investigation, Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) was successfully utilized for measuring the particle velocities in the impeller intra-blade passages of an optically clear centrifugal pump (a transparent casing and a transparent three-blade impeller). An optically clear slurry consisting of sodium-iodide solution and 500 μm spherical glass particles was used. The experiments were conducted at speeds of 725 and 1000 rpm with volumetric concentrations of 2.5% and 5% respectively. In the impeller passage region, the highest particle velocities are generated on the suction side of the blade and in the blade trailing edge region as the blade sweeps through. However, these particle velocities are slower than the circumferential velocity of the blade tip. The particle fluctuation kinetic energy increased approximately 200% to 500% as the pump speed was increased from 725 rpm to 1000 rpm. The maximum fluctuation kinetic energy occurred on the suction side of the blade. The directional impingement mechanism is more significant at the pressure side of the blade. This mechanism becomes more pronounced as the speed increases. The random impingement mechanism caused by the fluctuation kinetic energy of the solids can play an important role on the blade surface (pressure and suction sides) and the casing wall erosion. Frictional wear mechanisms can be caused by the particles that do not stay suspended in the flow and accumulate into sliding beds along the pressure side of the blade. PIV measurements in the slurry pump model can add significantly to the understanding of the flow through the pump.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicErosion and Abrasive MachiningFrench-language works237,207