MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998983271 · doi:10.2350/11-09-1091-cr.1

A Forme-Fruste Variant of Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft with Hamartomatous Adnexal Elements Managed without Z-Plasty

2012· article· en· W1998983271 on OpenAlexaff
David Grynspan, Yvonne Ying, Elizabeth Nizalik, Kyle N. Cowan, Joseph de Nanassy, Shirley Chou

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCleft Lip and Palate Research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnatomySinus (botany)InvaginationHamartomaStratified squamous epitheliumCordPathologySurgeryBiologyEpithelium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital midline cervical cleft is a relatively uncommon malformation of the anterior neck for which most of the current literature comprises case reports. There is a spectrum in clinical features, but the prototypical description is of a midline groove or cleft of atrophic skin with a skin tab at the cephalic end and an inferiorly oriented sinus tract at the caudal end. An underlying dense fibrous cord is usually described. The most widely postulated etiology is impaired midline fusion of the upper branchial arches. Some of the recent case reports advocate for removal of the defect and closure with Z-plasty. Here we report a case of a similar congenital lesion in a male patient. In our case, there was a conspicuous skin tab caudal to which there was a dense fibrous cord running vertically in the midline under the skin documented since the child was first examined at 5 months of age. The skin overlying the fibrous cord was mildly atrophic and only very subtly indented but was not desquamating or edematous. There was no open sinus tract at the caudal end, but within the skin tab, on histology, we did note an inclusion cyst lined by respiratory type mucosa with squamous metaplasia. The cord was composed of fibrous tissue and skeletal muscle, as has been described. In our case, we describe hamartomatous proliferations within the dermis of the skin tab, not previously described, which we feel provides further support to the embryologic closure defect hypothesis. Our case is distinct because the absence of an external cleft allowed for a more conservative surgical approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicCleft Lip and Palate ResearchFrench-language works237,207