MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999003094 · doi:10.3171/jns.2001.94.2.0281

Augmentation of endothelial function by endothelin antagonism in human saphenous vein conduits

2001· article· en· W1999003094 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Aaron S. Dumont, Fina Lovren, John H. McNeill, Garnette R. Sutherland, Chris R. Triggle, Todd J. Anderson, Subodh Verma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsBosentanMedicineVasoconstrictionEndothelin receptorInternal medicineEndothelin 1Endothelin receptor antagonistCardiologyAntagonistEndothelial dysfunctionEndotheliumSodium nitroprussideVasodilationAnesthesiaReceptorNitric oxide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECT: Cerebral revascularization with saphenous vein (SV) conduits is used in the management of hard-to-treat lesions that require deliberate arterial occlusion and in selected patients with occlusive vascular disease. Endothelial dysfunction is thought to contribute to acute perioperative vasospasm and chronic graft atherosclerosis. In the present study the authors examined the contribution of the potent vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 (ET-1) to endothelial dysfunction in human SVs. METHODS: The effects of an ET(A/B) receptor antagonist (bosentan), an ET(A) receptor antagonist (BQ-123), and an ET(B) receptor antagonist (BQ-788) on in vitro endothelium-dependent and -independent responses were studied in human SVs. Vascular segments were obtained in 34 patients who had undergone revascularization procedures, and isometric dose-response curves (DRCs) were constructed using the isolated tissue bath procedure as follows: 1) cumulative DRCs to norepinephrine; and 2) DRCs to acetylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside in the absence and presence of bosentan, BQ-123, or BQ-788. Maximal vasodilatory responses and sensitivity were compared between groups. In the presence of bosentan (Experiment 1) and BQ-123 or BQ-788 (Experiment 2), ACh responses were significantly augmented (percent maximum relaxation values: 7+/-2 [control] compared with 17+/-3 [bosentan], p < 0.002 [Experiment 1]; and 12+/-2 [control] compared with 29+/-2 [BQ-123] and 25+/-2 [BQ-788], p < 0.003 and p < 0.002, respectively [Experiment 2]). The sensitivity of SVs to ACh was unaffected by treatment. These beneficial effects were specific for the endothelium. CONCLUSIONS: Blockade of ET receptors significantly improves endothelial function in SVs. Furthermore, these effects appear to be independently and maximally mediated by antagonism of either ET(A) or ET(B) receptors. Interventions aimed at improving endothelial function may serve to counter perioperative vasospasm and impede atherosclerosis in SVs used for revascularization procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207