MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999013787 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2009.01.0011

Validation of Molecular Markers Associated with Net Blotch Resistance and Their Utilization in Barley Breeding

2010· article· en· W1999013787 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tajinder S. Grewal, B. G. Rossnagel, G. J. Scoles

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWestern Grains Research Foundation
KeywordsBiologyQuantitative trait locusHordeum vulgareMarker-assisted selectionPlant disease resistanceDoubled haploidyPopulationBreeding programPlant breedingGenetic markerAlleleGeneticsDrechsleraAgronomyBiotechnologyPoaceaeCultivarGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT With the advancement of molecular marker technology and computer software, mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) for complex traits in agricultural crops is frequent; however, exploitation of these QTL in practical breeding programs is limited. Here we report the validation of molecular markers linked to net blotch resistance QTL and their utilization in a barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) breeding program. Barley net blotch, caused by Pyrenophora teres Drechs. [anamorph: Drechslera teres (Sacc.) Shoemaker], is a serious foliar disease in Canada and other parts of the world. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers linked to net‐form net blotch (NFNB) resistance QTL ( QRpt6 ) and spot‐form net blotch (SFNB) resistance QTL ( QRpts4 ) were validated in two barley populations unrelated to the original mapping population. Marker‐assisted selection (MAS) was performed with SSR markers to select resistant and susceptible lines in two other populations. The lines homozygous for the resistant‐parent alleles at both marker loci had significantly lower infection than lines homozygous for the susceptible‐parent alleles at both markers, indicating that MAS for net blotch resistance is practical. Since the major QTL, QRpt6 , may provide adequate NFNB field resistance in western Canada, the plan for the Crop Development Centre (CDC) barley breeding program is to routinely utilize MAS for QRpt6 followed by normal field screening in disease nurseries to select the most resistant lines having additional resistance provided by less critical genes associated with other identified QTL. The CDC program has implemented routine MAS for QRpt6 and recommends this approach to other barley breeding programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrop ScienceSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207