MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999013811 · doi:10.1139/w04-068

Characterization of<i>Paenibacillus popilliae</i>rRNA operons

2004· article· en· W1999013811 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Douglas W. Dingman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
Keywords23S ribosomal RNARibosomal RNA16S ribosomal RNABiologyOperonGenegenomic DNAGeneticsMolecular biologyEscherichia coliRNARibosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The terminal 39 nucleotides on the 3' end of the 16S rRNA gene, along with the complete DNA sequences of the 5S rRNA, 23S rRNA, tRNA(Ile), and tRNA(Ala) genes were determined for Paenibacillus popilliae using strains NRRL B-2309 and Dutky 1. Southern hybridization analysis with a 16S rDNA hybridization probe and restriction-digested genomic DNA demonstrated 8 copies of the 16S rRNA gene in P. popilliae strains KLN 3 and Dutky 1. Additionally, the 23S rRNA gene in P. popilliae strains NRRL B-2309, KLN 3, and Dutky 1 was shown by I-CeuI digestion and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of genomic DNA to occur as 8 copies. It was concluded that these 3 P. popilliae strains contained 8 rrn operons. The 8 operon copies were preferentially located on approximately one-half of the chromosome and were organized into 3 different patterns of genes, as follows: 16S-23S-5S, 16S-ala-23S-5S, and 16S-5S-ile-ala-23S-5S. This is the first report to identify a 5S rRNA gene between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes of a bacterial rrn operon. Comparative analysis of the nucleotides on the 3' end of the 16S rRNA gene suggests that translation of P. popilliae mRNA may occur in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207