MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999019570 · doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0344-y

ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research

2013· review· en· W1999019570 on OpenAlexaff
Bryce B. Reeve, Kathleen W. Wyrwich, Albert W. Wu, Galina Velikova, Caroline B. Terwee, Claire Snyder, Carolyn E. Schwartz, Dennis A. Revicki, Carol M. Moinpour, Lori McLeod, Jessica C. Lyons, William R. Lenderking, Pamela S. Hinds, Ron D. Hays, Joanne Greenhalgh, Richard Gershon, David Feeny, Peter Fayers, David Cella, Michael Brundage, Sara Ahmed, Neil K. Aaronson, Zeeshan Butt

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality of Life Research · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityQueen's UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsInterpretabilityDocumentationReliability (semiconductor)Outcomes researchPsychological interventionComparative effectiveness researchEvidence-based practiceBest practiceMedicineHealth careQuality (philosophy)Construct validityMedical educationApplied psychologyPsychologyNursingPatient satisfactionComputer scienceAlternative medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.085
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.117
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0850.117
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.008
Bibliometrics0.0130.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.915
GPT teacher head0.651
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations857
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueQuality of Life ResearchSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207