MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999021991 · doi:10.1080/00359190309519934

Louis Leakey, self-styled White African: Appreciation and some personal recollections

2003· article· en· W1999021991 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Phillip V. Tobias

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Royal Society of South Africa · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of OxfordYork University
KeywordsTributeWifePrehistoryWhite (mutation)HistoryHumanityAKAAncient historyGenealogyAnthropologyArchaeologySociologyPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One hundred years after the birth of L.S.B. Leakey, it is fitting to pay tribute to one who did more than anyone else to unravel the story of humanity's past in Africa. This brief biographical sketch and personal appreciation shows how the pattern of his life was established even while he was an undergraduate at Cambridge, through his leadership of a series of expeditions to East Africa (his birthplace). His role in laying bare the prehistory of East Africa and in setting up the first outline of the archaeological sequence is briefly recounted, as are some of the genera and species of hominids which he and his wife Mary discovered. Leakey's recognition of earlier climatic changes in Africa is described including his—later discredited—delineation of four so-called pluvials, separated by interpluvials, which he considered to parallel the glacial and interglacial periods of Europe. Louis Leakey's deep involvement with the living peoples of East Africa is illustrated by his studies on the Kikuyu people. Some of the many difficulties with which he had to contend throughout his life are shown to provide the background to his career of struggle and of accomplishments wrested from a life of poverty and pain. Reference is made to the powerful impact which Dr Leakey had upon the life and career of the writer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Royal Society of South AfricaSame topicPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207