Radiosynthesis, ex vivo and in vivo evaluation of [11C]preclamol as a partial dopamine D2 agonist radioligand for positron emission tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dopamine D2 partial agonists have been successfully used as schizophrenia therapeutics. Radiolabeled D2 partial agonists may have application in elucidating dopaminergic transmission. It was the goal of this work to radiolabel (S)-(-)propyl-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidine (preclamol; (-)3-PPP), a partial dopamine D2 agonist with carbon-11 (half-life=20.4 min) and to evaluate this novel radiopharmaceutical for dopaminergic imaging in rodent models. [11C]Preclamol was synthesized by acylation of (S)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidine hydrochloride with [11C]propionyl chloride, followed by LiAlH4 reduction, and HPLC purification. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected in the tail vein with a saline solution of [11C]preclamol (1.1 mug/kg) and sacrificed at 5, 15, 30 and 60 min postinjection. Brain regions were excised, weighed, and measured for radioactivity. In vivo binding kinetics of [11C]preclamol were determined with beta-sensitive microprobes implanted into the striatum and cerebellum of an anesthetized rat. A full production of [11C]preclamol resulted in 34 mCi ready for injection (corresponding to 4% uncorrected radiochemical yield, based on starting [11C]CO2) with specific activity of 535 mCi/micromol. The total synthesis time was 45 min and resulted in chemically and radiochemically pure [11C]preclamol (>99%; n=3). High levels of radioactivity were observed in rat brain indicating good blood-brain barrier penetration of [11C]preclamol, with 0.5 to 0.7% injected dose per gram of wet tissue present in all brain regions at 5 minutes postinjection. Unfortunately, [11C]preclamol displayed minimal preferential uptake in dopaminergic brain regions. A low striatal specific binding (SB) ratio of 0.32 was determined ex vivo at 60 min postinjection and was in close agreement with the microprobe study over 60 min (peaked at 27 min postinjection; SB ratio=0.6). The binding potential value was only 0.34 over a 1 hour time course, suggesting that [11C]preclamol is not suitable for cerebral PET studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".