Chemosensitization of gemcitabine‐resistant human bladder cancer cell line both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> using antisense oligonucleotide targeting the anti‐apoptotic gene, clusterin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize changes in clusterin (sCLU-2) expression in bladder cancer cells after continuous treatment with gemcitabine and to determine whether knockdown of sCLU-2 can re-introduce sensitivity of gemcitabine-resistant cells to treatment with gemcitabine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A human bladder cancer cell line, UM-UC-3, was continuously exposed to increasing doses of gemcitabine in vitro, and a gemcitabine-resistant cell line UM-UC-3R was developed. The role of sCLU-2 in chemoresistant phenotype acquired in both in vitro and in vivo was then analysed using antisense oligonucleotide targeting the sCLU-2 gene (OGX-011). RESULTS: Treatment of parental UM-UC-3 cells (UM-UC-3P) with gemcitabine induced transient up-regulation of sCLU-2 protein. There was a sustained increase in sCLU-2 expression levels in UM-UC-3R compared with UM-UC-3P cells (6.4-fold). Treatment of UM-UC-3R cells with OGX-011 resulted in a dose-dependent and sequence- specific inhibition in sCLU-2 expression. Furthermore, OGX-011 chemo-sensitized UM-UC-3R cells to gemcitabine in vitro with a reduction in the concentration that reduces the effect by 50% (IC50) from 100 nm to 10 nm. Tumour volume and the incidence of metastasis in nude mice injected with UM-UC-3R cells was significantly greater than those of nude mice injected with UM-UC-3P cells; however, systemic administration of OGX-011 plus a low dose of gemcitabine significantly suppressed tumour volume and the incidence of metastasis in both groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that sCLU-2 plays a significant role in the acquisition of chemoresistant phenotype in bladder cancer cells and the knockdown of sCLU-2 using OGX-011 combined with a chemotherapeutic agent could be an attractive approach for advanced bladder cancer through the enhancement of chemosensitivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".