MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1999038338 · doi:10.1115/ipc2006-10169

Mitigation of Frost Heave of Chilled Gas Pipelines Using Temperature Cycling

2006· article· en· W1999038338 on OpenAlexaff
V.T. Morgan, Bipul Hawlader, Joe Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 1: Project Management; Design and Construction; Environmental Issues; GIS/Database Development; Innovative Projects and Emerging Issues; Operations and Maintenance; Pipelining in Northern Environments; Standards and Regulations · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)Centre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrost heavingPipeline transportPipeline (software)CentrifugeEnvironmental scienceCompressor stationFrost (temperature)Gas compressorEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringCyclingPermafrostChillerPetroleum engineeringGeologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of recent studies have been undertaken by the pipeline industry to improve understanding and design capability of frost heave issues related to the operation of large diameter chilled gas transmission pipelines through areas of discontinuous permafrost. These studies have included the assessment of methods of reducing the effects of frost heave on pipeline integrity, in particular the onset of significant bending strain due to differential vertical displacement of the pipeline. This paper will present one component of a study to investigate and assess the use of temperature cycling of the product as a means of reducing long-term frost heave of a pipeline system. The use of chillers at compressor station locations is considered a feasible method of controlling the gas temperature in the pipeline. The studies were undertaken using a geotechnical centrifuge as a cost effective means of obtaining physical test data under realistic soil stress conditions. The potential benefits of cyclic temperature operation in reducing pipeline strain are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 1: Project Management; Design and Construction; Environmental Issues; GIS/Database Development; Innovative Projects and Emerging Issues; Operations and Maintenance; Pipelining in Northern Environments; Standards and Regulations→Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→