MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999131890 · doi:10.2118/84561-pa

The Use of Lightweight Cement Slurries and Downhole Chokes on Air-Drilled Wells

2005· article· en· W1999131890 on OpenAlexaff
Devin Brown, Thomas Ferg

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Drilling & Completion · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
FundersConocoPhillips
KeywordsCasingCementLost circulationPetroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringDrillingGeologyCompletion (oil and gas wells)SlurryHydraulic fracturingDrilling fluidEngineeringMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The success of a primary cement job is often measured according to effective zonal isolation, achieving the designed top of cement, and avoidance of remedial cementing. In the San Juan and Rio Arriba counties of New Mexico, many Mesa Verde and Dakota wells are air-drilled because the Mesa Verde formation is subnormally pressured and naturally fractured. This combination makes the Mesa Verde easy to hydraulically fracture during normal drilling and cementing operations. Therefore, meeting the primary-cement-job success criteria is particularly challenging. Cementing of casing within an air-drilled wellbore allows the slurry to free fall. Cement free fall can cause severe surge pressures at the bottom of the hole, leading to hydraulic fracture initiation and loss of lift. Theuse of a downhole choke (DHC) can be employed to prevent these processes from occurring. Because mud filter cake does not exist in an air-drilled hole, the lead water spacer and cement must wet the casing and wellbore rock surfaces. Loss of the lead water spacer, in conjunction with cement water loss, can produce dehydration of the cement column, leading to an increase incement viscosity and equivalent circulating density. Careful control of cement-free water and fluid loss are required to prevent this from occurring. Further more, placing cement across targeted completion intervals that have low fracture gradients requires the use of ahigh-compressive-strength, low-density cement that is competent and capable of maintaining zonal isolation during the completion and production phases of well construction. This paper will outline the evolution of the cementing practices used forthe Mesa Verde and Dakota wells drilled in the 29-6 Unit (T29N−R6W, New Mexico) from 1998 to 2002. It will illustrate how cementing changes enabled the primary cementing to be successfully completed in a single stage instead of two, which has translated into cost savings for both the drilling and completion phases of a well. The impact of using a DHC for the pumping and placement of these primary cement jobs will be illustrated and discussed. The function of the cement additives on slurry properties will also be discussed as they pertain to these cement jobs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Drilling & CompletionSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207