Carbon and nitrogen supplementation to soybean through stem injection and its effect on soybean plant senescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Plant senescence studies have indicated that internal competition for nutrients such as carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) can be an important factor in the initiation of senescence. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to determine the effect of increased supplies of C and N on senescence of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr) plants. Soybean plants were injected with solutions of sucrose (150gL‐1), N (15 mM N), and distilled water from the onset of flowering until senescence using a modified stem injection technique. The average uptake rate of all solutions was 1.3 mL d‐1 per plant. The plants injected with sucrose accumulated the most biomass, followed by those injected with N and distilled water. Soybean plants injected with sucrose senesced 17 days later than the distilled water control while senescence was not delayed for plants injected with N. Injection of either N or sucrose increased the concentration and content of N in soybean plants. The results indicated that intra‐plant‐competition for reduced C plays an important role in plant senescence. Because the total amount of N injected was only 2% of the total plant N, as compared to 31 % for C, the role of intra‐plant competition for N was less clear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".