MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999247754 · doi:10.1515/cclm.2010.286

The use of serial patient blood gas, electrolyte and glucose results to derive biologic variation: a new tool to assess the acceptability of intensive care unit testing

2010· article· en· W1999247754 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital Edmonton
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsCoefficient of variationElectrolyteOutlierExtrapolationIntensive care unitMedicineStatisticsMathematicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Nuclear medicineUrologyChemistryInternal medicineChromatographyElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Most estimates of biologic variation (s(b)) are based on periodically acquiring and storing specimens, followed by analysis within a single analytic run. We demonstrate for many intensive care unit (ICU) tests, only patient results need be statistically analyzed to provide reliable estimates of s(b). METHODS: Over 11 months, approximately 28,000 blood gas measurements (including electrolyte panels and glucose) were performed on one of two Radiometer ABL800 FLEX analyzers (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark) from 1676 ICU patients. We tabulated the measurements of paired intra-patient blood samples drawn within 24 h of each other. After removal of outliers, we calculated the standard deviations of duplicates (SDD) of the intra-patient pairs grouped in 2-h intervals: 0-2 h, 2-4 h, 4-6 h, … 20-22 h and 22-24 h. The SDDs were then regressed against the time intervals of 2-14 h; extrapolation to zero time represents the sum of s(b) and short-term analytic variation (s(a)). RESULTS: Substitution of experimentally derived analytic error permitted the calculation of coefficient of variation (biologic) (CV(b)) (100 s(b)/mean): pH, 0.3%; pCO(2), 5.7%; pO(2), 13%; Na(+), 0.6%; K(+), 4.8%; Cl(-), 0.8%; HCO(3)(-), 3.2%; iCa(++), 2.4%; and glucose, 10.3%. The CV(b) of the electrolytes very closely matches the lowest estimates obtained in the usual manner. CONCLUSIONS: Derivation of the ratio of biologic to analytic variation indicates that the ABL800 is extremely suitable for ICU testing. This analysis should be extended to other point of care instrument systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.187
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.187
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it