Habitat requirements of the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker,<i>Sphyrapicus varius</i>, in boreal mixedwood forests of northwestern Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite its role as a keystone species, few studies have investigated the habitat requirements of the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker ( Sphyrapicus varius (L., 1766)) in the northwestern part of its range, where the current forest harvesting rotation schedule and targets for reducing the prevalence of old and mixedwood stands may reduce the optimal habitat for this species. We studied nesting and foraging habitat requirements of nesting sapsuckers in a boreal mixedwood forest of northwestern Canada by collecting data on nesting sites and foraging substrates on twenty-four 16- to 56-ha plots distributed among four habitat types in 1998 and 2002. Nests (n = 68) were generally found in large (≥22 cm diameter at breast height) trembling aspen ( Populus tremuloides Michx) that were alive but declining and that showed high incidence (81.1%) of heartwood rot infection ( Phellinus tremulae (Bondarzev) Bondarzev & Borisov in Bondarzev). Nest-site use by sapsuckers was predicted mainly by the presence of external fungal conks and tree diameter. Among tree species used as foraging substrates, paper birch ( Betula papyrifera Marsh.) (65.6%) and green alder ( Alnus viridis (Vill.) Lam. & DC.) (21.3%) were used most frequently. The use of birch was strongly correlated with its availability. Mature forests had higher densities of nesting sites and foraging substrates than immature aspen stands. In addition to reconfirming the importance of mature mixedwood forests for Yellow-bellied Sapsuckers, our study also indicates that forest harvest rotations in northwestern Canada should exceed 90 years to promote the keystone role of this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".