MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999293285 · doi:10.3171/foc/2008/25/9/e1

Advances in the Management of Epilepsy

2008· article· en· W1999293285 on OpenAlexaff
James T. Rutka

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgical FOCUS · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyTuberous sclerosisEpilepsy surgeryCorpus callosotomyMedicineIntractable epilepsyPopulationNeurosciencePsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PILEPSY remains one of the most common afflictions in humans, with a prevalence of about 1% in the general population. Since the advent of phenobarbital as a novel therapeutic agent for the prevention of seizures in patients in 1912, the medical and surgical treatments of epilepsy have advanced significantly. There were many early pioneers in epilepsy surgery, including Horsley, Keen, Nancred, and Sachs. 1,4 We must remember that their surgical attack on epilepsy was practiced long before we became familiar with the structure and function of the central nervous system, and the fine histoarchitecture of the neuronal networks within the cerebral cortex. Of course, the work of Penfield 2,3 in the 1930s set the stage for the modern revolution of surgical techniques applied to the study of human epilepsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgical FOCUSSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207