Characterization of the disturbed zone in a large rock excavation for the Three Gorges Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Excavation in a rock mass leads to the perturbation of the stress regime, often creating a stress-relieved, locally weakened zone known as the disturbed zone. This paper presents the results of in situ studies that were carried out both in the central rock barrier (or separation block) between the shiplift and the temporary shiplock and in the northern slope of the permanent shiplock of the Three Gorges Project. The vertical extent of the disturbed zone was determined jointly by cross-hole seismic wave penetration testing and borehole elastic modulus testing, and the horizontal extent was assessed by monitoring and evaluating the deformation characteristics. Compared with the undisturbed rock mass, the P-wave velocity of the disturbed zone was reduced by 3438% and the borehole elastic modulus by 1231%. The reductions were caused by the opening of primary structural planes or the extension of apertures due to local sliding along the structural planes. In the disturbed zone, no newly formed fractured planes were found. The observed disturbed zone was compared with the tensile stress zones and the shear-damaged zones calculated by the finite element method. A rock reinforcement scheme was recommended and implemented.Key words: disturbed zone, mechanical properties, brittle rock mass, excavation, finite element method, reinforcement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".