MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999353473 · doi:10.1038/am.2013.29

Thin-film metal oxides in organic semiconductor devices: their electronic structures, work functions and interfaces

2013· article· en· W1999353473 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNPG Asia Materials · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceWork functionNanotechnologyOrganic semiconductorThin filmSemiconductorElectrodeOxideOptoelectronicsCharge carrierEngineering physicsLayer (electronics)Chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin-film metal oxides are among the key materials used in organic semiconductor devices. As there are no intrinsic charge carriers in a typical organic semiconductor, all charges in the device must be injected from electrode/organic interfaces, whose energetic structure consequentially dictates the performance of devices. The energy barrier at the interface depends critically on the work function of the electrode. For this reason, various types of thin-film metal oxides can be used as a buffer layer to modify the electrode work function. This paper provides a review on recent progress in metal oxide/organic interface energetics, oxide valence structure and work function, as well as the impact of defects and interfacial reactions on oxide work functions. This review provides a rational guide to process engineers in selecting the best suitable electrode/oxide structures for a targeted applications. Organic semiconductors offer an attractive alternative to the traditional, silicon-based components of electronic devices. Cheaper to produce and more sustainable, they can also introduce different attributes, such as flexibility, to these devices. However, as organic materials do not typically possess intrinsic charge carriers — electrons or holes — all charges in the device must originate from the electrode and pass through the electrode-organic material interface, a process hindered by an energy barrier. Mark Greiner and Zheng-Hong Lu review recent achievements in a versatile class of buffer layer — thin films of transition metal oxides — that can be positioned between the two materials to reduce the energy barrier that limits charge injection. The researchers discuss how to select the most suitable metal oxide for a specific purpose, and then tune the thin film's properties by adjusting the thickness of the metal oxide layer, the oxidation state of its cations and the concentration of its defects. Over the last decade, metal oxides have proven to be important materials for organic electronics. Oxides are often used as charge-injection and charge-selective interlayers to engineer the electrical resistance at electrode/organic interfaces in organic devices. An oxide’s behavior as an interlayer depends strongly on the oxide’s electronic properties—such as its band structure and work function. The numerous degrees of freedom in an oxide’s electronic properties allow these characteristics to be easily modified. The present review outlines the use of metal oxides in organic electronics, and discusses the factors that affect the oxide’s properties that are relevant to oxide/organic interfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it