MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The First Orally Active Low Molecular Weight Agonists for the LH Receptor: Thienopyr(im)idines with Therapeutic Potential for Ovulation Induction

2002· article· en· W1999362670 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole C.R. van Straten, G. G. Schoonus-Gerritsma, R. G. van Someren, J. Draaijer, Anton E.P. Adang, C. Marco Timmers, Rob Hanssen, C. A. A. VAN BOECKEL

Bibliographic record

VenueChemBioChem · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvulationLuteinizing hormonePharmacologyEndogenyReceptorIn vivoChemistryOvulation inductionAgonistHormoneOral administrationMode of actionOrally activeEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pregnancy in pill form? The identification of low molecular weight (LMW) agonists for receptors normally triggered by high molecular weight (HMW) endogenous ligands is a great challenge for medicinal chemists. Thienopyrimidines and thienopyridines of general structures 1 and 2, respectively, are the first orally active LMW agonists for the G-protein-coupled luteinizing hormone receptor, which is responsible for ovulation induction. The LMW agonists display micromolar to nanomolar potencies and in vivo ovulation induction could be demonstrated in mice after oral administration. Thus, these compounds mimic the mode of action of the endogenous HMW glycopeptidic luteinizing hormone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations104
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemBioChemSame topicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesFrench-language works237,207