MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999423041 · doi:10.3109/14992020309078343

Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments: Umbrales de las respuestas auditivas de estado estable en adultos con hipoacusia sensorineural

2003· article· es· W1999423041 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Audiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudiologyAudiogramMedicineSensorineural hearing lossHearing loss

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluated the use of multiple auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) to estimate the degree and configuration of behavioral audiograms of subjects with sensorineural hearing impairments. Place specificity of the multiple-ASSR method was also assessed. Multiple amplitudemodulated (77–105 Hz) tones (500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) were simultaneously presented to one ear. The results showed that, on average, multiple-ASSR thresholds were 14±13, 8±9, 10±10 and 3±10 dB above behavioral thresholds for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz, respectively. Behavioral and multiple-ASSR thresholds were significantly correlated (r =0.75–0.89). There were no significant differences between behavioral and multiple-ASSR measures of the audiogram configuration. In subjects with steep-sloping ≥30 dB/octave) hearing losses, multiple-ASSR thresholds did not underestimate behavioral thresholds, revealing good place specificity. These results indicate that the multiple-ASSR method provides good estimates of the degree and configuration of hearing in individuals with sensorineural hearing impairments.Este estudio evaluó el uso de las repuestas auditivas de estado estable (ASSR) para estimar el grado y la configuración de la audiometria conductual en sujetos con hipoacusia sensorineural. También se evaluó la especificidad tonal del método de ASSR múltiple. Se presentaron tonos múltiples de amplitud modulada (77–105 Hz) en 500, 1000, 2000 y 4000 Hz en forma simultánea para cada oído. Los resultados muestran que en promedio, los umbrales de ASSR-múltiple son 14±13, 8±9, 10±10 y 3±10 dB por encima del umbral conductual para las frecuencias 500, 1000, 2000 y 4000Hz respectivamente. No hubo una diferencia significativa (r = 0.75–0.89) entre los umbrales conductuales y los umbrales por ASSR-múltiple en la configuración del audiograma. En sujetos con curvas de perfil descendente abrupto (≥30 dB/octave), los umbrales obtenidos por ASSR-múltiple no subestimaron los umbrales conductuales y demostraron buena relación de especificidad frecuencial. Estos resultados indican que el método ASSR-múltiple proporciona un buen estimado del grado y la configuración de la audición de los individuos con hipoacusia sensorineural.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it