MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999423041 · doi:10.3109/14992020309078343

Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments: Umbrales de las respuestas auditivas de estado estable en adultos con hipoacusia sensorineural

2003· article· es· W1999423041 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony T. Herdman, David R. Stapells

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Audiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudiologyAudiogramMedicineSensorineural hearing lossHearing loss

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluated the use of multiple auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) to estimate the degree and configuration of behavioral audiograms of subjects with sensorineural hearing impairments. Place specificity of the multiple-ASSR method was also assessed. Multiple amplitudemodulated (77–105 Hz) tones (500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) were simultaneously presented to one ear. The results showed that, on average, multiple-ASSR thresholds were 14±13, 8±9, 10±10 and 3±10 dB above behavioral thresholds for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz, respectively. Behavioral and multiple-ASSR thresholds were significantly correlated (r =0.75–0.89). There were no significant differences between behavioral and multiple-ASSR measures of the audiogram configuration. In subjects with steep-sloping ≥30 dB/octave) hearing losses, multiple-ASSR thresholds did not underestimate behavioral thresholds, revealing good place specificity. These results indicate that the multiple-ASSR method provides good estimates of the degree and configuration of hearing in individuals with sensorineural hearing impairments.Este estudio evaluó el uso de las repuestas auditivas de estado estable (ASSR) para estimar el grado y la configuración de la audiometria conductual en sujetos con hipoacusia sensorineural. También se evaluó la especificidad tonal del método de ASSR múltiple. Se presentaron tonos múltiples de amplitud modulada (77–105 Hz) en 500, 1000, 2000 y 4000 Hz en forma simultánea para cada oído. Los resultados muestran que en promedio, los umbrales de ASSR-múltiple son 14±13, 8±9, 10±10 y 3±10 dB por encima del umbral conductual para las frecuencias 500, 1000, 2000 y 4000Hz respectivamente. No hubo una diferencia significativa (r = 0.75–0.89) entre los umbrales conductuales y los umbrales por ASSR-múltiple en la configuración del audiograma. En sujetos con curvas de perfil descendente abrupto (≥30 dB/octave), los umbrales obtenidos por ASSR-múltiple no subestimaron los umbrales conductuales y demostraron buena relación de especificidad frecuencial. Estos resultados indican que el método ASSR-múltiple proporciona un buen estimado del grado y la configuración de la audición de los individuos con hipoacusia sensorineural.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations121
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AudiologySame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207