Differentiation and Detection of PDGF Isomers and Their Receptors by Tunable Aptamer Capillary Electrophoresis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tunable aptamer capillary electrophoresis (CE) techniques were developed to enable the separation and detection of platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) isomers and their receptors. Using an aptamer that formed a stable complex with the B chain but not with the A chain of PDGF, we were able to tweak the electrophoretic mobilities of the PDGF isomers for their separation. PDGF-AB bound to a single aptamer molecule was well resolved from PDGF-BB bound to two aptamer molecules. Simultaneous determination of 50 pM of two isomers was accomplished in a single analysis. Furthermore, PDGF-AB was used as a connector to bring receptor alpha and fluorescent aptamer into a single complex molecule. As a result, the formation of a (receptor alpha)-(PDGF-AB)-(fluorescent aptamer) ternary complex enabled the detection of the receptor alpha by tunable aptamer CE. A competitive assay was developed to determine receptor beta, making use of the competition between the receptor beta and fluorescent aptamer in binding to PDGF-BB. Detection limits were 0.5 nM for PDGF receptor alpha and 3 nM for receptor beta. Determination of PDGF isomers and their receptors in diluted serum samples showed no interference from the sample matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".