A Study of Unsaturated Pyrazolate-Bridged Diruthenium Carbonyl Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of Ru 3 (CO) 12 with approximately 3 equiv of 3,5-di- tert -butylpyrazole, (dbpz)H, in hexane at 170 °C in a stainless steel autoclave afforded the unsaturated, pyrazolate-bridged diruthenium complex [Ru 2 (CO) 5 (dbpz) 2 ] ( 2 ). The spectroscopic and structural analysis indicated that this compound contains a vacant coordination site at one axial position trans to the Ru−Ru linkage. This compound reacted with CO at room temperature to give the saturated complex [Ru 2 (CO) 6 (dbpz) 2 ] ( 1b ); its structure is analogous to that of the previously determined complexes [Ru 2 (CO) 6 (pz) 2 ], pz = pyrazolate and 3,5-dimethyl pyrazolate, except that the equatorial CO ligands show a skew arrangement, an indication of steric constraints within the coordination sphere. Treatment of 2 with benzyl isocyanide or with pyridine in toluene leads to the formation of substitution products [Ru 2 (CO) 4 (L)(dbpz) 2 ], L = CNCH 2 Ph and pyridine, in which the incoming donor ligand occupies an equatorial position at the saturated Ru center. The structural significance of this pyrazolate-bridged diruthenium complex 2 is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.069 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".