Phase behaviors and ordering dynamics of diblock copolymer self-assembly directed by lateral hexagonal confinement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thermodynamics and kinetics of the self-assembly of cylinder-forming diblock copolymers directed by the lateral confinement of hexagons have been studied by the combination of self-consistent field theory (SCFT) calculation and time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) theory simulation. The SCFT calculations are used to determine the stability of candidate 2D and 3D equilibrium phases formed in small-size hexagons. Our phase diagram predicts the existence of stable phase regions with respect to the hexagonal size, which is centered around the optimal size with an extent of about a period, for the phases of perfect hexagonal cylinders. Our TDGL simulations reveal that the ordering event, in which the structure evolves toward the perfect state, occurs stochastically according to the Poisson distribution, and the ordering time grows roughly with a power-law relation of the hexagonal size. This prediction is helpful to estimate the annealing time for larger systems with the knowledge of the annealing time of a small system in experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".