MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999529952 · doi:10.1016/s1836-9553(12)70130-3

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation appears to be useful in people with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2012· letter· en· W1999529952 on OpenAlex
Vasiliki Gerovasili

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of physiotherapy · 2012
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyCOPDSittingWastingStimulationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

QUESTION: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), what effect does neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) have on muscle function and walking endurance? DESIGN: Randomised, controlled trial in which the patients and those who collected outcome measures were blinded to group allocation. SETTING: Home-based intervention with outcomes collected at a hospital in Quebec City, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were clinically stable, sedentary and able to travel to the hospital with: (a) a smoking history >20 pack-years, (b) severe airflow obstruction, and (c) a 6-minute walk distance <400m. Exclusion criteria comprised any co-morbid condition associated with muscle wasting. Randomisation of 22 patients allocated 13 to the intervention group and 9 to the control group. INTERVENTIONS: Both groups received electrical stimulation 5 times a week for 6 weeks. Each session comprised 35min of bilateral stimulation for the quadriceps and 25min of bilateral stimulation for the calf. Stimulation was applied with the patient in sitting. They were encouraged to increase the intensity to the maximum they could tolerate. Patients were visited weekly at home by a research nurse to monitor progress. Parameters used by the intervention group were 50Hz frequency, 400μs pulse duration, and 6sec/16sec duty cycle. Parameters used by the control/sham group were 5Hz frequency, 100μs pulse duration, applied continuously. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was quadriceps strength. The secondary outcomes included quadriceps endurance and performance during the endurance shuttle walk test. RESULTS: Data were available on 12 and 8 patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Current intensity increased over the training period in the intervention group from 20±4mA to 31±10mA (p <0.001). Compared with the control group, the intervention group conferred greater gains in quadriceps force (difference in mean percent change from baseline 14%, 95% CI 1% to 26%) and endurance (42%, 95% CI 4% to 80%), but not walking endurance. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe COPD, NMES delivered at home enhanced muscle function but not walking endurance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it