MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999540316 · doi:10.1159/000129280

The Influence of the Interaction of Sutures with the Mucosa on Tumour Formation at Colonic Anastomoses in Rats

2008· article· en· W1999540316 on OpenAlexaff
Guy Hubens, E. Tott eacute, Arico C. Verhulst, Eric Van Marck, A Hubens

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Surgical Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnastomosisIntestinal mucosaSurgical anastomosisFibrous jointMedicineSurgeryPathologyChemistryAnatomyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to explore the respective role of wound healing and suture material on metachronous carcinogenesis at colonic lines in rats, tumour yield was studied after the administration of a chemical carcinogen (azoxymethane) at the moment that in one group of rats most of the suture material was still present and crypt cell proliferation elevated, while in another group, no more suture material was present and crypt cell proliferation rate (CCPR) normalized at the anastomotic site. Azoxymethane (15 mg/kg/week, s.c, during 6 weeks) was administered in male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 105) 8 weeks after the creation of an anastomosis in the ascending and descending colon with either stainless steel sutures (group A, n = 30) or fast-absorption Vicryl (Vicryl Rapide®, group B, n = 30). A control group (group C, n = 30) underwent a sham laparotomy before the administration of azoxymethane, while the animals of a fourth group (group D, n = 15) were not operated upon and received no azoxymethane. Twenty-six weeks after the first injection of azoxymethane there was no significant difference in the total colo-rectal tumour yield in the three operated groups (A, B, C), but a significantly greater proportion of anastomotic tumours (28/68 vs. 13/88, p < 0.01)and more anastomotic tumours per rat (28/23 vs. 13/28, p = 0.01) as well as more rats with anastomotic tumours (16/23 vs. 11/28, p = 0.04) were found in the steel-sutured group (A), compared with the control group (C). No significant differences were observed in tumour distribution between the groups in which the anastomoses were carried out with Vicryl Rapide (B) and the control group (C). Thirty-six weeks after operation steel sutures were recovered in 30.4% (7/23) of the left-sided anastomoses and in only 8.7% (2/23) of the right-sided anastomoses. At that time, CCPR was significantly elevated in the left-sided anastomoses only, while the CCPR in the right-sided anastomoses was normal when compared with all the other groups (A, B, C and D). The present study showed a shift in the distribution of tumours towards the anastomotic sites at which suture material was present and the CCPR raised, at the moment of carcinogen administration, confirming the importance of the interaction of sutures with the mucosa in tumour formation. The actual elimination process of the suture material might influence the CCPR and act as a cocarcinogenic factor. In view of these observations, either the use of strictly inert suture material or the development of sutureless anastomotic techniques should be encouraged in the construction of colonic anastomoses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Surgical ResearchSame topicColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207