10 years followup in children affected by various eye diseases: sensibility and specificity of VA, fundus and 30 Hz and mixed response electroretinogram done during anaesthesia as predictors of visual outcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose This study aimed to define the relationship between 30 herz and mixed maximal response electroretinogram, recorded under anaesthesia, and the visual outcome in subjects affected by various retinal and/or optic disk affections. Methods We present a review of 87 among 260 children examined under anaesthesia. All subjects(mean age 3,12)underwent ERG without adaptation, in a mid luminance, at 30 hertz and mixed maximal response. Results were matched with fundus findings and the visual acuities. Multiple statistical analysis comprehending student’s t test for independent samples was used for comparisons between groups. A P value of less than 0.05 was assumed to indicate statistical significance. Results Diagnosis linking fundus findings and ERG were: 7 Leber dystrophy, 12 ROP, 20 retinal dystrophy, 6 ny, 5 CVI, 2 Joubert syndrome, 1 Retinoblastoma, 5 ON coloboma, 1 Morning glory syndrome, 12 pale papilla, 2 congenital cataract associated with retinal anomalies, 14 not defined. Mean VA was 1,94 in right eye, 2,04 in the left. Significant correlations and “p” values were found between 30 hz amplitude, a and b amplitudes, b latency and visual acuities. ROC curves were statistically significant in latency and ampitudes in a and b waves. Conclusion Our work indicate a correlation between fundus findings, ERG and visual outcome. When we are unable to perform a correct diagnosis by visit and instrumental methods in awake conditions, a brief anaesthesia allow to obtain results otherwise arduous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".