MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999557447 · doi:10.1139/b03-082

Rapid and efficient production of the <i>Pyrenophora tritici-repentis</i> teleomorph

2003· article· en· W1999557447 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Timothy L. Friesen, Shaukat Ali, R. W. Stack, L. J. Francl, J. B. Rasmussen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAscosporePyrenophoraBiologyDarknessBotanyFungusDrechsleraAscocarpDothideomycetesMyceliumphotoperiodismHorticultureAscomycotaSporeCultivar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laboratory conditions were identified for efficient production of the teleomorph of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, causal agent of tan spot of wheat. Ascopcarp density (pseudothecia/cm 2 ) and timing of ascospore maturity and discharge were determined for the fungus incubated on green or senescent maize leaves under various light regimes at 15 °C. The most rapid ascospore maturity (20 days) and discharge (26 days) occurred in a 12-h photoperiod on green leaves. However, incubation in continuous darkness increased ascocarp density. Rapid and efficient ascospore production was obtained by incubating the fungus on senescent leaves in continuous darkness for 12 days followed by a 12-h photoperiod. This resulted in ascospore discharge in 29 days from a high density of pseudothecia. Further, 95% of pseudothecia sampled contained mature ascospores at the time of first discharge. The maximum ascospore discharge height observed was 8.8 cm. Pseudothecial neck development was positively phototropic.Key words: Drechslera, ascomycete, loculascomycete, tan spot, ascospore, pseudothecium

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207