Syntheses, Structures, Spectroscopy, and Chromotropism of New Complexes Arising from the Reaction of Nickel(II) Nitrate with Diphenyl(dipyrazolyl)methane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complexes [(dpdpm)Ni(2-NO3)2] (1), [(dpdpm)Ni(2-NO3)(1-NO3)(CH3CN)] (2), [(dpdpm)2Ni(1-NO3)(H2O)]NO3 (3), and [(dpdpm)2Ni(H2O)2][NO3]2 (4) (dpdpm = diphenyl(dipyrazolyl)methane, Ph2C(C3N2H3)2), have been prepared and characterized by IR and UV-vis-NIR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction studies. X-ray studies have confirmed that complexes 1-4 all adopt variously distorted octahedral structures in the solid state, the largest distortions arising from the small bite-angle of the bidentate nitrate ligand in 1 and 2. Magnetic moment measurements indicate that these solids are paramagnetic with two unpaired electrons. The solution 1H NMR data show that the paramagnetism is maintained in solution. Absorption spectra of 1-4 show three main bands in the region of 350-1000 nm representing spin allowed (d-d) transitions from the ground state 3A2g to the excited states 3T2g, 3T1g(3F), and 3T1g(3P). A weak shoulder was also detected at about 700-800 nm in most spectra, representing spin-forbidden transitions 3A2g 1Eg. A comparison of the crystal field parameters 10Dq and B for 1-4 to the corresponding values for related complexes indicated that these parameters are fairly insensitive to structural variations within this family of complexes. The 10Dq/B ratios show greater variations, but no clear correlations are apparent between 10Dq/B and such structural features as the nature of ligator atoms (N:O ratio), the bonding mode of the nitrate ligand, or the overall charge. Complexes 1 (green) and 2 (blue) interconvert as a function of temperature (solutions and solid samples), concentration of CH3CN (solutions), or CH3CN vapor pressure (solid samples).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".