Peripheral administration of AT<sub>1</sub>receptor blockers and pressor responses to central angiotensin II and sodium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central administration of AT1 receptor blockers prevents salt-sensitive hypertension and inhibits progression of CHF. We investigated in Wistar rats the effectiveness of peripheral administration of two AT1 receptor blockers, losartan and embusartan, in exerting central AT1 receptor blockade. Losartan or embusartan at doses of 30 and 100 mg/kg were administered subcutaneously (s.c.) as a single dose, or one dose daily for 6 days. The BP responses to intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of Ang II, i.c.v. infusion of Na+-rich aCSF (0.3 M NaCl), and intravenous (i.v.) injection of Ang II were then measured. Losartan or embusartan at 30 and 100 mg/kg both inhibited the BP increases induced by i.c.v. Ang II and, to a lesser extent, by Na+-rich aCSF. After a single dose, this inhibition was more pronounced for losartan. However, after 6 days of treatment, there were no significant differences between the effects of losartan and embusartan. Losartan and embusartan blocked responses to Ang II i.v. to a similar extent. These results indicate that results from single-dose studies may not reflect the chronic steady-state, and that during chronic treatment both AT1 receptor blockers are similarly effective in inhibiting AT1 receptors in the central nervous system, when assessed by pressor responses to acute increases in CSF Na+ or CSF Ang II.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".