MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999639324 · doi:10.1115/imece2003-43969

Time-Mean Wall Static Pressure Distributions and Module Friction Factors for Fully Developed Flows in a Rectangular Duct With Spatially Periodic Interrupted-Plate Inserts

2003· article· en· W1999639324 on OpenAlexaff
José A. Candanedo, Emile Aboumansour, B. R. Baliga

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReynolds numberDuct (anatomy)Dimensionless quantityMechanicsHydraulic diameterFriction factorMaterials scienceStatic pressureGeometryHeat exchangerGeologyPhysicsMathematicsAnatomyTurbulenceThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experimental study of fully developed flows of air in straight rectangular ducts with interrupted-plate inserts is presented. These flows have features akin to those produced in the cores of plate-fin compact heat exchangers. In all, flows in one plain duct and six different ducts with interrupted-plate inserts were studied. Values of the dimensionless geometric parameters of the interrupted-plate ducts, normalized with respect to its half-height, are the following: width of the duct cross-section between 19.68 and 23.58; plate length between 3.286 and 3.938; plate thickness of 0.062, 0.115, and 0.205; and inter-plate spacing between 3.264 and 7.815. Values of the Reynolds number, based on a nominal average velocity and hydraulic diameter, ranged from 1663 to 30993. The results include graphical and tabular presentations of time-mean static pressure distributions along the axial centerline of the top wall of the duct, and module friction factor versus Reynolds number data, all in the periodic fully developed region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer MechanismsFrench-language works237,207