Diffuse lamellar keratitis: isolation of endotoxin and demonstration of the inflammatory potential in a rabbit laser in situ keratomileusis model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To systematically examine sources of endotoxin contamination in eye centers as a potential cause of diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) and to demonstrate the inflammatory potential of endotoxin in a rabbit model of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. SETTING: University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. METHODS: In this prospective study, all water sources that routinely come in contact with LASIK instruments, including sterilizer reservoirs, eyedrops, microkeratome blades, and cleaning solutions, were examined for endotoxins at 5 eye centers. Bacterial cultures were performed on water samples from 5 sterilizer reservoirs. A LASIK flap was created in 8 rabbit eyes using an Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb). The flaps were reflected, and a dose of endotoxin at various concentrations was placed on the interface. After 1 minute, the flap was irrigated and repositioned. The rabbit eyes were examined daily with a slitlamp biomicroscope for 3 days for the development of DLK, which was classified on a scale from grade 1 to 4 (mild to severe). The rabbits were killed at the conclusion of the study, and the interfaces were stained to rule out infectious etiologies. RESULTS: Endotoxin was detected in significant concentrations in tap water, filtered and distilled water, instrument washbasins, and sterilizer reservoirs at all 5 centers. The cultures of the water samples taken from the sterilizer reservoirs ranged from no growth to the presence of >100 colony-forming units of Flavobacterium and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Endotoxins caused DLK-like interface inflammation in all eyes tested. Examination of stained scrapings showed no microorganisms in the interface of the rabbit eyes. CONCLUSION: Endotoxin contamination was detected in water sources that routinely come in contact with LASIK instruments. Endotoxins were capable of inducing interface inflammation in a rabbit model and may therefore be a significant factor in epidemic DLK.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".