MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999657815 · doi:10.1353/wic.0.0003

<i>The People Have Never Stopped Dancing: Native American Modern Dance Histories</i> (review)

2008· article· en· W1999657815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueWicazo Sa Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceIndigenousContext (archaeology)Native americanModern danceHistoryArtArt historyAnthropologyVisual artsSociologyEthnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The People Have Never Stopped Dancing: Native American Modern Dance Histories Maria Williams The People Have Never Stopped Dancing: Native American Modern Dance Histories, by Jacqueline Shea Murphy. University of Minnesota Press, 2007 Jacqueline Shea Murphy's recent book on Native American dance traditions within the modern context is one of the few academic publications that addresses American modern dance and its relationship to Native American traditions and history. The People Never Stopped Dancing is in three parts and focuses on how traditional Native American dance influenced the field of American modern dance as well as commentary on contemporary Aboriginal/Native American modern dancers and choreographers. I found the book to be a bit unfocused, but also containing relevant and important factual information, including historical references to how Aboriginal peoples/Native Americans were mistreated due to genocidal events and government policies, such as outlawing of dance and religion, and the overarching theme of "cleansing" tribes of their histories, cultures, and aesthetic practices. The author attempts to address the above within the framework of twentieth-century modern dance, from the Ruth St. Dennis and Ted Shawn Indian-inspired creative works to contemporary Native American dancers and choreographers such as Rosalie Jones, Red Sky Theatre/Sandra Laronde, Alejandro Ronceria, and others. The three main sections of the book include an initial section on the painful genocidal nineteenth-century policies and war on Indigenous peoples in both the United States and Canada that attempted to eradicate Indigenous languages, religion, and dance practices. The section is a bit disjointed in some aspects, but certainly the author is deserving of the fact that she recognizes the colonial period as destructive. Murphy mentions specific laws and identifies the racist rhetoric behind the doctrines that outlawed Native American culture. My critique of this section is that she does not acknowledge the diversity of Indigenous peoples, languages, religions, and dance/ music practices. Murphy paints broad brushstrokes, so that it appears that Aboriginal peoples/Native Americans were and are monolithic. It tends to maintain the idea that Native Americans can all be lumped together under one rubric, defined and understood by one perspective. This, as most experts on Indigenous history realize, is a common mistake. However, in the area of dance history, this is one of the few [End Page 108] books that acknowledges the genocidal histories of the United States and Canada. The second section of Murphy's book is on modern dance in the twentieth century and how Martha Graham, Ruth St. Dennis, Ted Shawn, and other non-Indigenous dancers/choreographers acknowledged the aesthetics behind Indigenous dance forms and how they were influenced by them. Ruth St. Dennis and Ted Shawn in particular choreographed work based directly on Native American dance forms, always performing the pieces themselves, or by their all-white dancers dressed as "Indians." The irony that the governments of the United States and Canada were doing everything they could to eradicate Indigenous communities, while white artists were enamored of the "tribal" aesthetics and spirit found in Indigenous communities, is not adequately addressed here. The third section, which should be the largest of the book and the main focus, is on Aboriginal/Indigenous choreographers in the United States and Canada. The author mentions in her introduction the amount of fieldwork she conducted, the interviews with Native American choreographers such as Rosalie Jones, and her attendance at various events that highlighted Aboriginal and/or Native American contemporary performing arts. This section of the book is less than seventy pages, whereas the first section is over one hundred pages (including the introduction) and the second section is almost eighty-five pages. The author, in her last page, gives a running list of contemporary Aboriginal/Native American choreographers, with a suggestion that readers can do online research if they want more information. I would suggest that this be the first part of the book, and that it be greatly expanded and placed in the context of the material in her first two sections. Overall, Murphy addresses the issue(s) of how white or Anglo American dancers have "played Indian" on stage, the detrimental and racist government policies that labeled anything non-Christian and non-white as...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWicazo Sa ReviewSame topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207