MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A quantum-dynamics study of the prototropic tautomerism of guanine and its contribution to spontaneous point mutations inEscherichia coli

2001· article· en· W1999717873 on OpenAlexaff
Leonid Gorb, Y. Podolyan, Jerzy Leszczyński, Willem Siebrand, A. Fern�ndez-Ramos, Zorka Smedarchina

Bibliographic record

VenueBiopolymers · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
FundersNational Center for Research Resources
KeywordsTautomerChemistryGuanineThymineMoleculeComputational chemistryDNAStereochemistryNucleotideOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-level quantum-chemical and quantum-dynamics calculations are reported on the tautomerization equilibrium and rate constants of guanine and its complexes with one and two water molecules. The results are used to estimate the fraction of guanine present in the cell during DNA synthesis as the unwanted tautomer that forms an irregular base pair with thymine, thus giving rise to a spontaneous GC --> AT point mutation. A comparison of the estimated mutation frequency with the observed frequency in Escherichia coli is used to analyze two proposed mechanisms, differing in the extent of equilibration reached in the tautomerization reaction. In the absence of water, the equilibrium concentration of tautomeric forms is relatively large, but the barrier to their formation is high. If water is present, tautomeric forms are less favored, but water molecules may serve as efficient proton conduits causing rapid tautomerization. It is tentatively concluded that the mechanism in which a high tautomerization barrier keeps the tautomeric transformation far from a state of equilibrium is more likely than a mechanism in which water and/or polymerases produce a low equilibrium concentration of the tautomeric forms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiopolymersSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207