A quantum-dynamics study of the prototropic tautomerism of guanine and its contribution to spontaneous point mutations inEscherichia coli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-level quantum-chemical and quantum-dynamics calculations are reported on the tautomerization equilibrium and rate constants of guanine and its complexes with one and two water molecules. The results are used to estimate the fraction of guanine present in the cell during DNA synthesis as the unwanted tautomer that forms an irregular base pair with thymine, thus giving rise to a spontaneous GC --> AT point mutation. A comparison of the estimated mutation frequency with the observed frequency in Escherichia coli is used to analyze two proposed mechanisms, differing in the extent of equilibration reached in the tautomerization reaction. In the absence of water, the equilibrium concentration of tautomeric forms is relatively large, but the barrier to their formation is high. If water is present, tautomeric forms are less favored, but water molecules may serve as efficient proton conduits causing rapid tautomerization. It is tentatively concluded that the mechanism in which a high tautomerization barrier keeps the tautomeric transformation far from a state of equilibrium is more likely than a mechanism in which water and/or polymerases produce a low equilibrium concentration of the tautomeric forms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".