Photodynamic therapy for advanced bile duct cancer: Evidence for improved palliation and extended survival
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Median survival time of nonresectable hilar bile duct cancer is only 4 to 6 months owing to tumor spread in the biliary tree, refractory cholestasis, and sepsis or liver failure. We explored whether local photodynamic therapy of nonresectable bile duct cancer could improve survival. A sample size of 23 patients is required to detect an increase in 6-month survival rate from less than 50% to greater than 70% in a single-arm phase-II trial with a statistical power of 80% (Fleming's single step procedure; alpha = 0.05). Twenty-three consecutive patients (8 women, 15 men; 67 +/- 14 years) with nonresectable bile duct cancer (Bismuth type III n = 2, type IV n = 21) were treated with photodynamic therapy and biliary endoprosthesis. Photofrin (QLT Pharmaceuticals, Vancouver, Canada) (2 mg/kg body weight intravenously) was photoactivated after 1 to 4 days with laser light (630 nm; 242 J/cm(2)) via endoscopic retrograde access. The 6-month survival rate was 91% after diagnosis and 74% after start of photodynamic therapy (30-day mortality rate was 4%) at a median follow-up time of 10.3 months after diagnosis. Causes of death were tumor progression (n = 9) and bacterial infections (n = 4). The median rate of local tumor response was 74%, 54%, 29%, and 67% after the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth photodynamic therapy. Time to progression ranged from 3 to 8 months. All patients, except 1 with diffuse liver metastases, improved in cholestasis, performance, and quality of life. Photodynamic therapy can prevent tumor occlusion of hilar bile ducts. The apparent benefit in survival time should be confirmed in a controlled trial versus palliation by endoprosthesis only.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".