MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999756447 · doi:10.1002/hep.510310205

Photodynamic therapy for advanced bile duct cancer: Evidence for improved palliation and extended survival

2000· article· en· W1999756447 on OpenAlex
Frieder Berr, Marcus Wiedmann, Andrea Tannapfel, Ulrich Halm, K. Kohlhaw, Frank Schmidt, Christian Wittekind, Joachim Mössner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhotodynamic therapyCholestasisGastroenterologyBile ductSurvival rateSurgeryInternal medicineCancerBile duct cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Median survival time of nonresectable hilar bile duct cancer is only 4 to 6 months owing to tumor spread in the biliary tree, refractory cholestasis, and sepsis or liver failure. We explored whether local photodynamic therapy of nonresectable bile duct cancer could improve survival. A sample size of 23 patients is required to detect an increase in 6-month survival rate from less than 50% to greater than 70% in a single-arm phase-II trial with a statistical power of 80% (Fleming's single step procedure; alpha = 0.05). Twenty-three consecutive patients (8 women, 15 men; 67 +/- 14 years) with nonresectable bile duct cancer (Bismuth type III n = 2, type IV n = 21) were treated with photodynamic therapy and biliary endoprosthesis. Photofrin (QLT Pharmaceuticals, Vancouver, Canada) (2 mg/kg body weight intravenously) was photoactivated after 1 to 4 days with laser light (630 nm; 242 J/cm(2)) via endoscopic retrograde access. The 6-month survival rate was 91% after diagnosis and 74% after start of photodynamic therapy (30-day mortality rate was 4%) at a median follow-up time of 10.3 months after diagnosis. Causes of death were tumor progression (n = 9) and bacterial infections (n = 4). The median rate of local tumor response was 74%, 54%, 29%, and 67% after the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth photodynamic therapy. Time to progression ranged from 3 to 8 months. All patients, except 1 with diffuse liver metastases, improved in cholestasis, performance, and quality of life. Photodynamic therapy can prevent tumor occlusion of hilar bile ducts. The apparent benefit in survival time should be confirmed in a controlled trial versus palliation by endoprosthesis only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it