First-Principle Computational Study on the Full Conformational Space of <scp>l</scp>-Threonine Diamide, the Energetic Stability of Cis and Trans Isomers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
First-principle computations were carried out on the conformational space of trans and cis peptide bond isomers of HCO-Thr-NH2. Using the concept of multidimensional conformational analysis (MDCA), geometry optimizations were performed at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory, and single-point energies as well as thermodynamic functions were calculated at the G3MP2B3 level of theory for the corresponding optimized structures. Two backbone Ramachandran-type potential energy surfaces (PESs) were computed, one each for the cis and trans isomers, keeping the side chain at the fully extended orientation (chi1=chi2=anti). Similarly, two side chain PESs for the cis and trans isomers were generated for the (phi=psi=anti) orientation corresponding to approximately the betaL backbone conformation. Besides correlating the relative Gibbs free energy of the various stable conformations with the number of stabilizing hydrogen bonds, the process of trans-->cis isomerization is discussed in terms of intrinsic stabilities as measured by the computed thermodynamic functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".