The influence of buoyancy and drag on the dive behaviour of an Arctic seabird, the Thick-billed Murre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We used time–depth recorders to investigate the behaviour of free-ranging Thick-billed Murres ( Uria lomvia L., 1758) after attaching positively (n = 9), negatively (n = 10), or neutrally (n = 9) buoyant handicaps and increasing cross-sectional area by 3% (2.8 cm 2 ; n = 8) or 6% (5.6 cm 2 ; n = 6). When buoyancy was altered or drag increased, murres reduced dive depth and duration, suggesting that murres do not manipulate dive depth to obtain neutral buoyancy during the bottom phase. Ascent rate increased as the bird surfaced and mean ascent rate increased for deeper dives, presumably reflecting steeper dive angles and greater buoyancy during deep dives. For short dives (<150 s), preceding surface pauses were better correlated with dive depth and duration than succeeding surface pauses (surface pauses were “anticipatory”), suggesting that murres control inhalation rates based on anticipated dive depth and duration. Murres reduced ascent rate near the surface, possibly to reduce the risk of decompression sickness. Neutrally buoyant recorders attached to the legs had no effect on chick feeding frequencies or adult mass loss, suggesting that this attachment method may have the least effect on the foraging behaviour of alcids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".