Effects of H <sub>1</sub> and H <sub>2</sub> Receptor Agonists on Nonspecific Proliferative Response of Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Histamine is known to modulate immune responses through the induction of suppressor cell subsets. The inhibition studies with antagonists suggest that the H2 agonist accounts for most of the suppression. This work studies the effects of various concentrations of 3-methyl histamine (as negative control), histamine, and pure H1 (2-methyl histamine, 2-pyridyl ethylamine) and H2 (4-methyl histamine, dimaprit) receptor agonists on the mitogenic (phytohemagglutinin A) proliferative response of normal human lymphocytes. At high concentrations of agonists (10(-3), 10(-4) M) the suppression induced by the two types of agonists is comparable to that of histamine. At lower concentrations (10(-6) M) the suppression is seen only in the presence of the H2 agonist. The suppression induced by the two agonists is generally reversed in the presence of an H2 receptor antagonist. The H1 receptor antagonist did not abolish and even increased the suppression induced by histamine and the two agonists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".