Chronic DNA Damage and Niacin Deficiency Enhance Cell Injury and Cause Unusual Interactions in NAD and Poly(ADP-Ribose) Metabolism in Rat Bone Marrow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous work has shown that niacin deficiency in rats increases the severity of ethylnitrosourea (ENU)-induced anemia and leukopenia and the long-term development of cancer. The current study was initially designed to characterize changes in bone marrow cell populations during ENU treatment in this model. Weanling Long-Evans rats were fed diets containing 0 or 30 mg/kg of added niacin for a period of 2-3 wk. ENU treatment started after 1 wk of feeding and consisted of either 4 or 8 doses of ENU delivered by gavage, every other day. Niacin deficiency (ND) alone caused a significant depression in nucleated red blood cells (30%), and a sporadic effect on granulocytes (+23% after 4 doses of vehicle, -29% after 8 doses of vehicle). ENU treatment, after only 4 doses, caused a large decline in the numbers of bone marrow cells, and this effect was enhanced by ND (ENU decreased lymphocytes by 66% in pair-fed (PF) and 86% in ND, granulocytes by 41% in PF and 64% in ND, and nucleated red blood cells by 63% in PF and 71% in ND). Cell cycle distribution suggested that bone marrow cells in niacin-adequate rats, but not ND rats, mounted a compensatory proliferative response during chronic ENU exposure. ND alone caused an 80% decrease in bone marrow NAD+ levels at all time points. Surprisingly, chronic exposure to ENU (which should cause DNA damage and NAD+ utilization) led to a 2.8-fold increase in NAD+ content in ND marrow cells. This finding led to a second study in which ND and niacin-adequate PF control rats received 7 doses of ENU or vehicle (CON), after which all rats received 1 dose of ENU. In this study, modestly enhanced bone marrow NAD+ in chronically treated PF rats was used to synthesize 2-fold greater amounts of poly(ADP-ribose) than seen after one acute dose of ENU, while this did not occur in chronically treated ND rats, in spite of a 2.8-fold increase in bone marrow NAD+. This study has shown that bone marrow cell populations are sensitized to ENU treatment by ND, that NAD+ pools are regulated in response to DNA damage, and that NAD+ localization and/or utilization in the nucleus is altered during ND and chronic DNA damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".