MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Ivory Vertebra

2002· article· en· W1999903482 on OpenAlexaff
Lucia Carpineta, Michel R. Gagné

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticEtiologyVertebraNatural historySurgeryPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. OBJECTIVES: To report and discuss the natural evolution of fortuitously found solitary radiodense or "ivory" vertebrae in two asymptomatic patients; to review the existing literature concerning ivory vertebrae; and to provide a practical guide for the diagnostic and management approach to the fortuitous finding of ivory vertebrae in asymptomatic patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The asymptomatic and apparently idiopathic ivory vertebra is often a very problematic clinical situation. Previous studies have hypothesized that although several etiologies have been known to be responsible for producing ivory vertebrae, the most likely etiology, particularly for so-called "idiopathic" ivory vertebrae, is early and asymptomatic Paget's disease of bone. METHODS: Two patients, each with an incidentally discovered ivory vertebra, were followed clinically over a period of 13 and 10 years, respectively. During this time the patients underwent a multitude of investigations in an attempt to identify the etiology of the ivory vertebra. After having eliminated ominous etiologies, the authors opted for a conservative approach to management (observation) so as to have a long-term follow-up of the patients and also attempt to determine the natural history of idiopathic solitary ivory vertebrae. RESULTS: Despite the extensive workups, no etiology was ever found for either patient because the tests showed normal results for extended periods of time. Whereas in one patient Paget's disease of bone was suspected, no definitive confirmation for the presence of Paget's disease could be obtained, even on bone biopsy. Both patients remained entirely asymptomatic with respect to the ivory vertebra over the entire follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Based on the observations from the present study as well as a review of the literature on the subject, a decision-making algorithm is put forth for the investigative approach as well as for the subsequent follow-up and management of patients with idiopathic and asymptomatic ivory vertebrae whereby, after baseline screening tests eliminate ominous pathology, observation and periodic clinical reassessment are advised until symptoms develop or until there are radiographic changes in the appearance of the ivory vertebra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicBone health and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207