MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999923690 · doi:10.1353/cor.0.0062

Cancionero autógrafo de Pedro de Padilla, manuscrito 1579 de la Biblioteca Real de Madrid (review)

2010· article· es· W1999923690 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dorothy Sherman Severin

Bibliographic record

Venue˜La œcorónica/˜La œCorónica · 2010
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutographArtStyle (visual arts)PoetryHumanitiesFifteenthArt historyClassicsLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Cancionero autógrafo de Pedro de Padilla, manuscrito 1579 de la Biblioteca Real de Madrid Dorothy Sherman Severin Labrador Herraiz, José J., & Ralph A. DiFranco, eds. Cancionero autógrafo de Pedro de Padilla, manuscrito 1579 de la Biblioteca Real de Madrid. México: Frente de Afirmación Hispanista, 2007. 255 pp. Dep. legal GU-021-2008 José Labrador Herraiz and Ralph A. DiFranco have produced yet another volume in their invaluable series of sixteenth-century manuscript cancioneros, this one, an autograph by the now-obscure but formerly well-considered Padilla (1549?-1600), an important link between fifteenth-century traditional Castilian styles and the Italianate mode of the sixteenth. As a Carmelite, Padilla gives some understandable importance on religious genres, but, surprisingly, there is a significant proportion of love poetry represented, some of it in the Italianate style, but a preponderance in the traditional canción form, with glossed refrain. The authors have produced an exhaustive catalogue of appearances elsewhere of these autograph poems as an appendix, and they show that ninety eight of them are uniques. Of these, many are unique love canciones, with [End Page 232] one notable sequence of religious villancicos in the Encina/Fernández style amongst them. Curiously, although refrains with their glosses are mostly intact here, a few of the refrains are printed elsewhere in the Padilla canon without their glosses, and a few of the glosses without their refrains. Obviously, some of the lone refrains belong to other poets or are traditional, but printing another poet's refrain without the Padilla gloss seems to indicate an accidental omission. The interesting Carolingian ballads and those of an Orlando furioso cycle were previously published by Maxim Chevalier. The authors give a brief but informative history of the author and of the manuscript. History-of-the-book enthusiasts, however, might have wished for a more rigorous description of the manuscript itself according to current norms of description, as folios are both out of sequence and bound with later copies of the author's work. A few diagrams (now easily produced on word processing programmes and easily reproduced by most modern printers) would not have been amiss, as in these cases the sketch is mightier than the pen. However the authors have produced their usual magic in deciphering material that is in the process of correction and revision and is far from straightforward to read and interpret. This edition helps to bring to the attention of early modern poetry specialists a neglected figure whose work deserves further attention – and should receive it now that we have this valuable addition to his printed canon. Dorothy Sherman Severin University of Liverpool Work Cited Chevalier, Maxim. Los temas ariostescos en el romancero y la poesía española del Siglo de Oro. Madrid: Castalia, 1968. [End Page 233] Google Scholar Copyright © 2010 MLA Division on Medieval Hispanic Languages, Literatures & Cultures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜La œcorónica/˜La œCorónicaSame topicEarly Modern Spanish LiteratureFrench-language works237,207