The Study of Solution-Focused Group Counseling in Decreasing Depression among Teenage Girls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of solution-focused approach in decreasing depression amongteenage girls. Depression is one of the most common diseases in these days which have been known as mentalflu. Adolescence also plays a pivotal and key role in our in which depression is very common. So it is necessaryto treat this disorder in adolescence.This research is a quasi-experimental design in which pretest-posttest design with a control group has been used.The population was all teenage girls in Sahneh; 20 girls were drawn from the population through stratifiedrandom sampling and then randomly assigned to two groups: one experimental and one control. Data werecollected through Beck's depression questionnaire (BDI). Dependent variable was solution-focused therapy inwhich experimental group was provided with 8-hour group counseling (8 sessions which took one hour). In themeantime, control group was provided with irrelevant teachings (teaching study skills) to eliminate the effect ofsubjects. After the sessions were wound up, BDI questionnaire was administered again among both groups. Onemonth later, the posttest and then BDI questionnaire were conducted. After that, t test and covariance were usedto analyze the findings. The results showed that solution-focused group counseling is effective in decreasingdepression among teenage girls and its significance level is at ?= 0/01. In addition, the findings obtained throughposttest indicated how stable the effect of therapy is. In other words, solution-focused group counseling hassignificantly led to decreasing depression in teenage girls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".