Cinema and technology:cultures, theories, practices.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biographical Notes Acknowledgements Introduction: B.Bennett, M.Furstenau& A.Mackenzie PART 1: FORMAT The Perilous Gauge: Canadian Independent Film Exhibition and the 16mm Mobile Menace P.Lester BMW Films and the Star Wars Kid: 'Early Web Cinema' and Technology A.Clay On Some Limits to Film Theory (Mainly From Science) J.Elkins PART 2: NORMS Socially Combustible: Panicky People, Flammable Films, and the Dangerous New Technology of the Nickelodeon P.Moore Cinema and its Doubles: Kittler vs. Deleuze J.Harris Genomic Science in Contemporary Film: Institutions, Individuals and Genre K.O'Riordan PART 3: SCANNING Cinema as Technology: Encounters with an Interface A.Wood Demonlover : Interval, Affect and the Aesthetics of Digital Dislocation M.Manojlovic 'Into the decor': Attention and Distraction, Foreground and Background C.Rodrigues Children, Robots, Cinephilia and Technophobia B.Bennett PART 4: MOVEMENT Lola and the Vampire: Technologies of Time and Movement in German Cinema M.Langford Inbetweening: Animation, Deleuze, Film Theory B.Schaffer Affective Troubles and Cinema M-L.Angerer Afterword: Digital Cinema and the Apparatus: Archaeologies, Epistemologies, Ontologies T.Elsaesser Bibliography Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it