MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000125285 · doi:10.2118/126452-ms

Fracture Mechanics Interpretation of Leak-Off Tests

2009· article· en· W2000125285 on OpenAlexaff
Bernt S. Aadnøy, Vahid Mostafavi, G. Hareland

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholeLeakLost circulationFracture (geology)MechanicsStress (linguistics)Point (geometry)Ultimate tensile strengthInterpretation (philosophy)Fracture mechanicsGeotechnical engineeringGeologyPetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceStructural engineeringDrillingDrilling fluidEngineeringComputer scienceMathematicsMechanical engineeringPhysicsComposite materialGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a model for leak-off interpretation that includes evaluation after the borehole is fractured. The Kirsch equation is valid up to the conventional leak-off point, but beyond leak-off the hole is fractured, and an elastoplastic bridge model applies to ultimate failure. Also presented is an evaluation of in-situ stress interpretations from leak-off tests. Findings of the new model are that the leak-off point using Kirsch is correctly defined by the in-situ stress state and the rock tensile strength. The model also explains the circulation loss problem with oil based drilling fluids where the wellbore strength reduces to the minimum horizontal stress level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207